[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.1-81-g2a3db2

From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.1-81-g2a3db25
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 19:32:44 +0000

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU Guile".

The branch, stable-2.0 has been updated
       via  2a3db25e283a6b8e30d9761546605e7cae757c67 (commit)
      from  ad4bd7c2c0c931a91160772e5ebf40af0f471874 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 2a3db25e283a6b8e30d9761546605e7cae757c67
Author: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
Date:   Sun May 22 15:23:27 2011 -0400

    Don't call scm_lock_mutex and scm_unlock_mutex via pointer of wrong type
    * libguile/threads.c (lock_mutex_return_void, unlock_mutex_return_void):
      New static functions that simply call scm_lock_mutex and
      scm_unlock_mutex, respectively, but return void instead of SCM.
      (scm_dynwind_lock_mutex): Pass unlock_mutex_return_void to
      scm_dynwind_unwind_handler_with_scm, and lock_mutex_return_void to
      scm_dynwind_rewind_handler_with_scm.  Previously, we passed
      scm_unlock_mutex and scm_lock_mutex (which return SCM), but the
      scm_dynwind_* functions expect pointers to functions which return
      void.  When SCM is of type union, this changes the calling conventions
      of the functions on some platforms (e.g. GCC 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 on x86).


Summary of changes:
 libguile/threads.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libguile/threads.c b/libguile/threads.c
index def9281..64807f8 100644
--- a/libguile/threads.c
+++ b/libguile/threads.c
@@ -1456,12 +1456,24 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_lock_mutex_timed, "lock-mutex", 1, 2, 0,
 #undef FUNC_NAME
+static void
+lock_mutex_return_void (SCM mx)
+  (void) scm_lock_mutex (mx);
+static void
+unlock_mutex_return_void (SCM mx)
+  (void) scm_unlock_mutex (mx);
 scm_dynwind_lock_mutex (SCM mutex)
-  scm_dynwind_unwind_handler_with_scm ((void(*)(SCM))scm_unlock_mutex, mutex,
+  scm_dynwind_unwind_handler_with_scm (unlock_mutex_return_void, mutex,
-  scm_dynwind_rewind_handler_with_scm ((void(*)(SCM))scm_lock_mutex, mutex,
+  scm_dynwind_rewind_handler_with_scm (lock_mutex_return_void, mutex,

GNU Guile

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]