[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.7-87-g5ad85b

From: Andy Wingo
Subject: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.7-87-g5ad85ba
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:45:41 +0000

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU Guile".

The branch, stable-2.0 has been updated
       via  5ad85ba15f901163190b365ddd744db22bbbfc42 (commit)
      from  10a467f39887b722cb4cffa1a22c94a7b1e37bbc (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 5ad85ba15f901163190b365ddd744db22bbbfc42
Author: Daniel Hartwig <address@hidden>
Date:   Thu Feb 14 11:23:51 2013 +0800

    update old references in FFI doc
    * doc/ref/api-foreign.texi (Foreign Types): Replace references to the
      old foreign->bytevector and bytevector->foreign with the new procedure
      names using pointer.


Summary of changes:
 doc/ref/api-foreign.texi |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/ref/api-foreign.texi b/doc/ref/api-foreign.texi
index 2473870..e595668 100644
--- a/doc/ref/api-foreign.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/api-foreign.texi
@@ -803,8 +803,8 @@ int64_t a; uint8_t b; @}}:
 @end example
 As yet, Guile only has convenience routines to support
-conventionally-packed structs. But given the @code{bytevector->foreign}
-and @code{foreign->bytevector} routines, one can create and parse
+conventionally-packed structs. But given the @code{bytevector->pointer}
+and @code{pointer->bytevector} routines, one can create and parse
 tightly packed structs and unions by hand. See the code for
 @code{(system foreign)} for details.

GNU Guile

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]