[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libguile/goops.c

From: Michael Livshin
Subject: Re: libguile/goops.c
Date: 04 Dec 2000 23:08:52 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko)

"Dale P. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:

> Michael Livshin wrote:
> > 
> > "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > I see that the keywords "class", "template", "new", "delete", "private" 
> > > and
> > > "mutable" are used as variable names in libguile/goops.c.  These are all
> > > reserved keywords in C++, so compiling guile with a C++ compiler is at the
> > > moment impossible...
> > 
> > and what would be the point of doing it, anyway?
> Doesn't scwm require guile to be compiled as c++ if configured to use
> constraints?

I don't remember any such requirement, but then I last used SCWM a
year ago.

the mind boggles at the thought.

"Tools that are no good require more skill."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]