[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ice-9/and-let*.scm
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: ice-9/and-let*.scm |
Date: |
11 Dec 2000 20:22:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> There are two possibilities:
>
> One, continue to simplistically map module names to filenames and
> demand that all module names make for sensible filenames.
>
> Two, allow all Scheme symbols are module name components and map to
> sensible filenames in a platform specific way.
>
> The first solution would require us to rename `(ice-9 and-let*)' and
> tell people to use the new name. We can install a compatability
> module for the transition period (on systems that allow it).
>
> The second solution is cleaner but requires more porting work. What
> is a sensible filename?
>
> Opinions?
the second option seems cleaner. the porting work can be reduced by
using a simplistic encoding that would map any non-letter-or-number
character to a %<char-code>, a la the standard URL encoding.
would that work?
--
Don't trust these UNIX people. They are all demons. They kill their
parents and fork children. I don't know how they could do this with
their balls cut off but they manage. -- anonymous
Re: ice-9/and-let*.scm, Keisuke Nishida, 2000/12/12