[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gh_ vs. scm_ Interfaces

From: Chris Cramer
Subject: Re: gh_ vs. scm_ Interfaces
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:00:22 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:45:09PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Another consideration ISTR is the idea that the gh interface could be
> implemented by a completely different interpreter than Guile, and that
> therefore, if you wrote an extension using only the gh interface, you
> could plug in any interpreter that implemented the gh interface.
> Realistically, I very much doubt that this will ever happen, so I
> think that we should drop this angle.

Actually, MzScheme supports the gh interface.

C. Ray C. aka Christopher Cramer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]