[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:34:15 +0100 (MET)
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Keisuke Nishida wrote:
> Is it a good idea to add the following snarf macros for smob definitions?
I am not sure yet: We probably should not overuse the snarf macro stuff.
However, it may be a clean way to add documentation about smob types.
Further, it could simplify automatic code generation via SWIG or g-wrap,
since it would be sufficient to add code at a single place. So, I suggest
to add them to your proposal for new snarf macros so we can postpone that
decision until we actually come to including those new macros.
- SCM_DEFINE_SMOB_*, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/01/22
- Re: SCM_DEFINE_SMOB_*,
Dirk Herrmann <=