[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Dirk Herrmann
Subject: Re: SCM_DEFINE_SMOB_*
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:34:15 +0100 (MET)

On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Keisuke Nishida wrote:

> Is it a good idea to add the following snarf macros for smob definitions?

I am not sure yet:  We probably should not overuse the snarf macro stuff.
However, it may be a clean way to add documentation about smob types.  
Further, it could simplify automatic code generation via SWIG or g-wrap,
since it would be sufficient to add code at a single place. So, I suggest
to add them to your proposal for new snarf macros so we can postpone that
decision until we actually come to including those new macros.

Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]