[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: binary loadable files

From: Michael Livshin
Subject: Re: binary loadable files
Date: 31 Jan 2001 20:12:39 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake)

Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:

> At Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:53:49 +0100 (MET),
> Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> > 
> > > Hmm, I guess write-object / read-object might be the best in this sense.
> > 
> > Well, these don't give any indication of their 'binary' nature.  So what
> > about write-object-binary / read-object-binary?  A little bit verbose, but
> > tells really all that is needed.
> What about `binary-read' and `binary-write'?  These might be better
> because they indicate they use a different format than that of
> `read' and `write', while taking the same types of arguments.

also be sure to take a look at `oop/goops/save.scm' in the

Shit doesn't hurt the world.  It provides valuable fertilizer to help
plants grow, grass to help cows, and at least 33% of the content of
off-brand chocolates.           --Dave Lynch in

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]