[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eval

From: Marius Vollmer
Subject: Re: eval
Date: 09 Feb 2001 16:24:22 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> On 7 Feb 2001, Neil Jerram wrote:
> > In fact, of course, it is _very_ different.  The problem is the
> > implicit reference to `the-module'.  Yet, if we follow Dirk's
> > suggestion of making the reference explicit, as in
> > `(eval/no-module-restore exp (current-module))', and `exp' is
> > `(define-module (some thing))', we arrive back at the interpretation
> > of a meaningless (IMO) expression.
> Hmmm?  With the definition of eval/no-module-restore (or
> primitive-eval) the expression
>   (eval/no-module-restore '(define-module (some thing)) (current-module))

Please note that `primitive-eval' will only take one argument, an

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]