[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Planning work
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Planning work |
Date: |
01 May 2001 18:59:55 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > If two different modules both export the same name, what happens
> > when both modules are imported?
>
> The module that has been imported last wins. This is more by accident
> than by design. I think we should report a conflict.
This is exceedingly dangerous. Something like Common Lisps alerts and
warnings about such loads is really called for.
So what is the naming convention in use to avoid such conflicts? Is
it the "package DASH symbol" convention (what Emacs uses)?
- Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around), (continued)
- Re: Planning work, Chris Cramer, 2001/05/04
- Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/04
- Re: Planning work, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/05/06
- Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/09
Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/01
- Re: Planning work, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/01
- Re: Planning work,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
Planning work, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/05/01