Re: Making the libguile API explicit

[Martin Grabmueller]

> From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
> Date: 06 Jun 2001 01:17:11 +0200
> 
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > IMO the better approach is to 
> > 
> > * First, detect non-API stuff in the header files.
> > 
> > * Second, if possible, put non-API stuff into the corresponding .c files
> >   and make it static.
> > 
> > * Third, rename the remaining non-API stuff using the SCM_I_ and scm_i_
> >   prefixes.
> 
> Yep, I like that better than the SCM_API macro.

And what do you think about adding a macro for making windows
compilation possible?  We could name it

  GUILE_EXPORT

or similar to make its function more obvious.

Regards,
  'martin