[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer |
Date: |
20 Jun 2001 11:51:23 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> Michael, did you receive my mail of last week?
yup, and replied to the list. my mail to you bounces (I'm trying
again now, but it probably won't work, 'cause all BigFoot addresses
are apparently banned at your end).
[ if Matthias doesn't see this either (within a day or two), could
someone please forward it to him? ]
here goes, slightly edited:
*strange*.
can you tell me how does the following command behave on your system?
echo 'argpos ( ( ( ( ( SCM ) ( ( ( const scm_bits_t * ) ( ( SCM_CELLPTR ) ( ( (
scm_bits_t ) ( * args ) ) ) ) ) [ 0' | sed -e 's/^argpos.*[(\[].*//'
it is supposed to eat everything. it does so on my Linux system at
home and on the Solaris 2.5.1 and HP/UX systems at work. is the sed
incantation I use somehow non-portable?
many thanks,
--mike
--
Long computations which yield zero are probably all for naught.
- Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/25
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/25