[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuation efficiency
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: continuation efficiency |
Date: |
08 Jul 2001 12:24:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> It uses a different algorithm.
The code you posted for call/ec is a wrapper around call/cc. Asking
about *guile*, if it's a wrapper around call/cc, it can't be faster
than call/cc, unless guile does fancy continuation optimizations (which
I was told it doesn't).
So again: you said that:
1) In guile, call/ec might be a primitive, but in fact is not.
2) In guile, call/ec is faster than call/cc.
How can those two statements be true?
- Re: continuation efficiency, (continued)
- Re: continuation efficiency, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Klaus Schilling, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Klaus Schilling, 2001/07/09
Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/06
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/10