[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:46:54 +0200 |
> From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
> Date: 13 Jul 2001 01:30:09 +0200
>
> The thing about catch/throw in particular is that I think it is
> abused for error handling. It conflates two concepts that should be
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hum? I suppose you mean abused for non-local transfer of control? Or
am I missing something?
> kept separate: non-local transfers of control, and registering for
> handling certain exceptional situations.
Confused,
'martin
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, (continued)
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/05
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/06
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/06
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/07
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/09
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/10
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/10
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/11
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/12
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/12
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers,
Martin Grabmueller <=
- Re: Line/column numbers in user supplied exception handlers, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/22