[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check"
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check" |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:22:58 -0700 |
From: Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:39:53 +0200
I just stumbled across a problem. The examples in the box*
directories contain Guile extensions written in C. For simplicity I
thought it'd be better not to build them by default, and they require
an installed guile-config script to figure out the include/linker
flags.
wow, i see you are almost finished the job. cool.
Now I'm not sure how to handle this. Should we build them by
default, e.g. should `make all' build them? Then the test scripts
would be similar to those in `scripts'. Or should they only built
when `make check' is run? Or should they not be run at all?
IMHO, they should be built on "make all", if that's possible w/ an
uninstalled guile-config... hmmm, quick testing shows that invocation
like so: "libguile/.libs/guile -s guile-config/guile-config" exits
silently instead of showing the familiar help info.
thi
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/07/17
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check",
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/17
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Rob Browning, 2001/07/17
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/07/21
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Rob Browning, 2001/07/21
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/07/21
- Re: DTRT wrt authorship info + using examples in "make check", Rob Browning, 2001/07/21