Re: guile-1.5.1 and deprecated ...

[David Pirotte]

Thomas Wawrzinek wrote:
> 
> ...
> Yes, but this would require to know in advance which "protocols" you
> need. This can become very inconvenient in a large application under
> constant development.

from an appl. devel. point of vue, there should be no difference for a
developer between:

        1. defining 2 classes in the same module, with one accessor
           bearing the same `name' (and exporting it) 

        and

        2. having these 2 classes defined in different modules

with a 3d module using either the first solution either the second, or
both, don't you think? 

david