[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_num2float() ?
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: scm_num2float() ? |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Sep 2001 22:34:17 +0200 (MEST) |
Replying on my own message (blush ...)
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> Well, let's say that I'm in favor of a minimalistic approach. IMO, we
> should make Guile as small as possible - but not smaller.
Just to make my point clear: We should make the _core_ of guile as small
as possible - but not smaller. There should, of course, be lots of
extension modules. Each of which, however, should for its specific
purpose be just as small as possible - but not smaller :-)
Best regards
Dirk Herrmann
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, (continued)
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Michael Livshin, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Michael Livshin, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_num2float() ?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_num2float() ?,
Dirk Herrmann <=