[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feature? or provided?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: feature? or provided? |
Date: |
06 Sep 2001 19:39:54 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> On 6 Sep 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> > Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > ;;; presumably deprecated.
> > > (define feature? provided?)
> > >
> > > Deprecated or not?
> >
> > Pfhrr, beats me. What are people using? Off hand, I'd say that
> > `feature?' should remain.
>
> Well, I prefer `provided?╢, since `feature?╢ sounds more like a type
> predicate.
I prefer `feature?', but that's maybe because I'm used to Emacs.
in Emacs, the way I see it, the idea of `provide' is to register a
feature, not to put a symbol in some predefined list. it's about the
intent. some features are never provided by calling `provide', they
just exist.
--
Experienced C programmers are rearer than they think.
-- Joe Marshall, comp.lang.lisp