[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any reason GUILE_X_VERSION shouldn't be defined in a public header?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any reason GUILE_X_VERSION shouldn't be defined in a public header? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2001 23:56:46 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> [Sorry this is late - I've been away.]
>
> Why "SCM_GUILE_" rather than just "SCM_"? If you defend "SCM_GUILE_",
> why should we not rename everything that we already have to
> "SCM_GUILE_"?
The only possible reason would be to more directly match the names
used in ./GUILE-VERSION and the build infrastructure. However, from a
libguile UI perspective you're right. I wondered about this at the
time, and I'd be happy to switch the #define names if that's
considered more appropriate.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD