[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?
From: |
stefan |
Subject: |
Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 21:06:30 +0100 (CET) |
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Rob Browning wrote:
> > cool thanks, i have started to look at this. although i think there
> > might be some policy issues (what to include in the API), i'm sure the
> > macrology seems sound. one style issue i'd like to bring up early: the
> > cpp macro __SCM_IMPORT__ and friends should probably be replaced w/
> > something like HAVE_SCM_API, HAVE_SCM_REGEX_API, since there is
> > machinery for this style already.
>
> Right, and also because (correct me if I'm wrong), C reserves any
> symbols starting with an underscore...
Well, if this is, I agree changing:
__SCM_IMPORT__ -> SCM_IMPORT
__SCM_EXPORT__ -> SCM_EXPORT
__SCM_RL_IMPORT__ -> SCM_RL_IMPORT
__SCM_RL_EXPORT__ -> SCM_RL_EXPORT
__SCM_SRFI1314_IMPORT__ -> SCM_SRFI1314_IMPORT
__SCM_SRFI1314_EXPORT__ -> SCM_SRFI1314_EXPORT
The defines __REGEX_IMPORT__, __CRYPT_IMPORT__ and __READLINE_IMPORT__ are
definitions of the referring MinGW packackes and cannot be changed
currently.
Cheers,
address@hidden
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/28
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, Rob Browning, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?,
stefan <=
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/31