[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str()
From: |
stefan |
Subject: |
Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str() |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:29:55 +0100 (CET) |
On 16 Nov 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> stefan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > If noone objects I would like to put the following piece into the
> > "Decisions" section:
>
> What would the functions do?
Uhm. Quite exactly the same as their gh_*() counterparts. That is a
FIXME in the current documentation: Find some equivalent for each gh_*()
function.
Cheers,
address@hidden
- proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/12
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/12
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/19
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/19
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/19
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/19
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/21
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/21
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/21
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/22
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/22
- Re: proposal: scm_string2str() and scm_symbol2str(), stefan, 2001/11/22