[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Argh! Module system frustration.
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Argh! Module system frustration. |
Date: |
21 Nov 2001 20:40:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > (I'd rather not have people use the module system from C too much.)
>
> Hmm, if you're really deeply integrating guile into a C app, then I
> suspect that at least scm_c_module_lookup and perhaps also
> scm_c_module_define (though I suspect that a scm_c_module_set! would
> be more commonly useful) will probably often be necessary.
Yes, and that's mostly why there is C API to the module system at all.
But I'd like it to be considered `advanced`.
Hmm, well, that's not a very constructive position. I think I'm going
to write some paragraphs for the manual of how we intent people to use
libguile with C programs, both for adding an extension language to an
existing application, and for writing extensions to Guile itself, that
will then be the basis for applications written in Scheme.
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., (continued)
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/13
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/13
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/13
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/20
- Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Rob Browning, 2001/11/20
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2001/11/13
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Rob Browning, 2001/11/20
Re: Argh! Module system frustration.,
Marius Vollmer <=
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Neil Jerram, 2001/11/21
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/23
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Neil Jerram, 2001/11/28
Re: Argh! Module system frustration., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2001/11/29