Re: UNSIGNED_ITYPE_MAX signed?

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> is it a bug or a feature that UNSIGNED_ITYPE_MAX is a signed value?

Is it?

> I would expect it to be an unsigned value.  However, I have applied the
> patch below to num2integral.i.c, and it just does not work (giving errors
> in srfi-4) or gives 'comparing signed and unsigned' warnings if I leave
> out the cast operations in the line after the FIXME comment.

I don't get any errors or warnings with your patch.  Maybe it's the
version of GCC that you are using.  I have

    gcc version 2.95.4 20011006 (Debian prerelease)

What are you trying to do?