[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gh_lookup() equivalent

From: stefan
Subject: Re: gh_lookup() equivalent
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:46:21 +0100 (CET)


your proposal is just what I am using myself at the time as a replacement.
Thus the implementation is not the problem.  My actual question is due to
the comment:

   should this be SCM_UNSPECIFIED?  Can a symbol ever legitimately be
   bound to SCM_UNDEFINED or SCM_UNSPECIFIED?  What is the difference?

If you can gurantee the return value cannot be bound to a symbol you can
use the replacement code you proposed.  If not we would need a further
argument *and* a return value.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]