[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: readline and libguile
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: readline and libguile |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:55:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:05:25AM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote:
> rm> Hmm, i just checked my old .guile file. It seems that guile 1.7.0
> doesn't
> rm> need this (which is not what the FAQ says).
>
> OK. Does Guile now go into (guile-user) before loading .guile?
Just a testcase:
| ;; file: $HOME/.guile
| (display (current-module))
| (newline)
| (use-modules (ice-9 readline))
| (activate-readline)
|
| bash-2.05$ guile
| #<directory (guile-user) 8083280>
|
so, yes, i think that is the case. My guile reports to be
version 1.7.0, if that matters.
> rm> A related question: what is needed to get the readline support built.
> rm> I recall a '--with-gnu-readline' option of 'configure' but didn't find
> rm> it in recent CVS version of 'configure'. Is this now autodeteced (and
> if
> rm> so, how does one _disable_ readline support even if the library is
> rm> present)?
>
> I think it is autodetected, and I don't know how one would disable it,
> I'm afraid. I guess one could work it out from ./configure, though.
Ok, i thought so. But doesn't this kind of work against
the whole idea of _not_ activating readline support by default?
I know, legaly it's the (dynamic?) linking that probably matters,
but with the current setup it seems to be pretty hard to produce
a readline-free guile executable (no problem with me, but after
all the effort with guiles readline support ...).
Ralf
> Neil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
Re: readline and libguile, Neil Jerram, 2002/02/10