[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling BUGS.
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Handling BUGS. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:32:11 -0800 |
From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
Date: 24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100
I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be
enough.
numbers are symbolic (see comp.lang.lisp thread on packaging). they
have extra properties that are useful for ordering and concise to
reference.
Yes, good point. What about simply saying that the bug file itself
has no "." in its name, and related files like test scripts do?
i suggest dot dirs in my other mail (using numbers, but i fancy
N.SHORT-DESC would be the righteous hybrid solution).
thi
- Re: Handling BUGS., (continued)
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/23
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS.,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/22
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/22