Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16)

[rm]

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:36:07PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> [...]

Thanks for the clarification.
 
> So the question is, what *is* the right thing to do?  The FSF
> "standards" info pages have a little relevant info, but nothing
> definitive:
> 
>    The `README' file should also refer to the file which contains the
>    copying conditions.  The GNU GPL, if used, should be in a file
>    called `COPYING'.  If the GNU LGPL is used, it should be in a file
>    called `COPYING.LIB'.

Ah, licences with namespaces ;-) So why not COPYING.GUILE and GPL?
I have to admit that i didn't see the amount of work required to rename
the files (never rename base classes).

> So I've filed a bug against the GNU standards package.  Let's see what
> they say...

Delegate ...

 Thanks, Ralf

> Rob Browning
> rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
> Previously @cs.utexas.edu
> GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel