[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16)

From: rm
Subject: Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 12:22:22 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.24i

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:36:07PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> [...]

Thanks for the clarification.
> So the question is, what *is* the right thing to do?  The FSF
> "standards" info pages have a little relevant info, but nothing
> definitive:
>    The `README' file should also refer to the file which contains the
>    copying conditions.  The GNU GPL, if used, should be in a file
>    called `COPYING'.  If the GNU LGPL is used, it should be in a file
>    called `COPYING.LIB'.

Ah, licences with namespaces ;-) So why not COPYING.GUILE and GPL?
I have to admit that i didn't see the amount of work required to rename
the files (never rename base classes).

> So I've filed a bug against the GNU standards package.  Let's see what
> they say...

Delegate ...

 Thanks, Ralf

> Rob Browning
> rlb,, and
> Previously
> GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]