[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: read errors
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: read errors |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 01:15:56 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> > Maybe this is a kludge?
>
> No, I think it's the best we can do with the present system.
ok.
> > snprintf (s, 1024, "%s\nThis happened in %s%s%s line %d column %d",
> > message,
>
> Can we use scm_simple_format here? That would avoid the 1024 limit
> and would also feel more gentle since we don't need to poke into the
> strings private parts.
Yep, done, committed. (Scheme beginner, didn't know about
simple-format.)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen