Re: Bug in eval-string?

[Marius Vollmer]

Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > What about adding "with" as a general dynamic scoping construct?
> >
> >   (with ((current-module) boxx)
> >      ...)
> 
> Please don't.
> 
> AFAIK, dynamic-scoping hacks of this flavor are commonly known as
> FLUID-LET in Scheme:

But "with" is such a nice name compared to "fluid-let"! ;) I forgot
one level of parenthesis in the code above, it was supposed to work
for multiple bindings.

I'd say that fluid-let should be in the core. Opinions?