[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: port initialization?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: port initialization? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:06:00 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> > I took a look at the scm_memory_error() calls. From what I gather,
> > most of them are not really valid, in the sense that they often follow
> > malloc() calls (as opposed to scm_malloc) -- it might be that GC-ing
> > frees enough memory to satisfy the request.
>
> I see. So we should probably replace the calls to malloc with calls
> to scm_malloc. Anyone? :-)
in CVS.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- port initialization?, Han-Wen, 2002/08/04
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/16
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/09
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/11
Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08