[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation...
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
Subject: |
Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation... |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Dec 2002 03:57:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Another thing I'd like to suggest is that when considering things like
> whether or not we should have unmemoization, first-class macros, etc.,
> we consider how these things might affect an offline compiler.
Oops... This reminds me of another consideration I had when opting to
work on Scheme source: While methods are normally optimized at
generic application time, goops source can be compiled offline.
If the optimizer does source --> source transformation it's reasonably
easy to use it together with an offline compiler. It's more difficult
to explain the memoized code to the compiler...
M
- expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/03
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation...,
Mikael Djurfeldt <=
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/03
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/12/03
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/03
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/12/04
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/04
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/12/04
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/04
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Marius Vollmer, 2002/12/05
- Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., Rob Browning, 2002/12/05
Re: expansion, memoization, and evaluation..., klaus schilling, 2002/12/04