[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: scm_make_gsubr question

From: Marius Vollmer
Subject: Re: scm_make_gsubr question
Date: 20 Jan 2003 09:58:20 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> > - The corresponding operation on the Scheme level is achieved much
> >   more elegantly by closure.
> [...]
> > - The most sensible approach IMO for a Guile-based application is to
> >   do the minimum possible in C for the maximum benefit in Scheme.
> I tend to agree.  I wonder how often a user_data solution would be
> better than restructuring the problem...

However, when his patch is nice and clean, we can have it both!  We do
already have 'compiled closures', but I think they are a bit

GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]