[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS versus error

From: Kevin Ryde
Subject: Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS versus error
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:44:43 +1000
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> Right now (if I'm still uptodate), only one thread can
> execute 'in Guile',

Oh, I thought you'd said previously there could be concurrent such
threads.  (I'd meant to try to work up a section for the manual on
such things.)

> Yes.

I realized since posting, that time() on a DOS system might be
affected by the TZ changes made by the other stime.c functions.

I guess all that stuff ought to change to use a little mutex
controlling access to TZ.  getenv/putenv would have to cooperate with
that too so a mere temporary change is not seen or overridden.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]