Re: lazy-handler-dispatch and debug-on-error

[Mikael Djurfeldt]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Jarc <address@hidden> writes:
>
>     Paul> FWIW, the definition of lazy-handler-distpatch itself
>     Paul> already looks a lot like that lambda.  It appears that you
>     Paul> can set default-lazy-handler inside the REPL to get the
>     Paul> desired effect.
>
> Yes, that's what I did before.  But that required a new variable
> `default-default-lazy-handler', which set me wondering what the
> original design was.

The original design might have had something to do with being able to
cut the stack at a proper level in order to get a nice backtrace
printout.  But this should have been solved later by the introduction
of start-stack.  (You still might want to check that stack cutting
works after your change.)

M