[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sun, 30 May 2004 15:00:21 +0100
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 19:40 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> It would be interesting to see if we could map the Scheme semantics
> (true = !SCM_BOOL_F) to C. That would require mapping SCM_BOOL_F to
> (void*)0x0. Is this desirable, and does anyone see a possibility for this?
I've been caught by this error a few times, and the scheme true/false
semantics do map nicely to C.
Howeverm the idea has some problems. For one, I don't think passing a
union to `if' (which is what SCM is in SCM_DEBUG_TYPING_STRICTNESS==2)
Secondly, I might be bit-stupid, but after about five minutes of
looking, I can't find a nice set of tc3 type tags having #f==0 for which
a fast SCM_IMP can be defined. This hints that trying to do #f==0 is a
bad idea because it constrains the implementation.
Dunno, just my cent-and-a-half.
Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
- Re: typechecking, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/10
- Re: typechecking, Dale P. Smith, 2004/05/10
- Re: typechecking, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/05/10
- Re: typechecking, Dirk Herrmann, 2004/05/15
- Re: typechecking, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/05/26
- Re: typechecking, Dirk Herrmann, 2004/05/30
- Re: typechecking, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/05/30
- Re: typechecking, Dirk Herrmann, 2004/05/31
- Re: typechecking,
Andy Wingo <=