[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shared arrays

From: Neil Jerram
Subject: Re: Shared arrays
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:38:33 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3

Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:

2004-10-27  Marius Vollmer  <address@hidden>

        First cut at integrating uniform vectors from srfi-4 with the rest
        of Guile.  This change replaces scm_tc7_byvect with a s8 uniform
        vector.  The plan is to gradually replace one type after the other
        until none is left and then to consider general cleanups and

This is great.  Just one comment.  I do hope we'll keep the ability to
create shared arrays.  This is similar in spirit to list structures
and mutation-sharing substrings, and extremely useful.
Just for the record (as I know you've already responded on this point), I second this. My application - which I described in the survey thread - depends heavily on shared subarrays/subvectors.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]