[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm. |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:06:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> Whenever we want to do things differently, we should push those
> changes into SLIB.
Certainly. That's what I assume we're trying to determine here.
i.e. are there any changes in the current slib.scm that haven't made
it upstream, but should?
For example, aside from the "eval in interaction-environment vs slib"
issue, see also the comments in slib.scm regarding *features* and
slib:load. Do we need or want to preserve any of those changes?
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Future of ice-9/slib.scm., (continued)
- Future of ice-9/slib.scm., klaus schilling, 2005/11/16
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Greg Troxel, 2005/11/16
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/17
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Greg Troxel, 2005/11/18
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Marius Vollmer, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Marius Vollmer, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/20
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Kevin Ryde, 2005/11/20
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/20