Re: Guile 1.7.91 has been released.

[Bill Schottstaedt]

Andy Wingo says:
> I once did some painful CVS bisection, which for the compiler flags I was
> using brought it back to the introduction of the inline keyword in 2002
> or something.

Perhaps you're on to something -- the "inline" business reminded me of
the old pstate bug where a variable was being optimized off the stack
causing premature gc, or something like that.  So, I rebuilt guile using
-g3 and not -O2, and the build ran to completion!  Unfortunately, it's still
not right; guile doesn't segfault but I get:

/home/bil/test/ bin/guile
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
   ?: 130* [syntmp-gen-syntax-1074 #(syntax-object # #) #(syntax-object # #) 
...]
   ?: 131  (if (syntmp-id?-115 syntmp-e-1110) (let* (#) (let* # #)) ...)
     ...
   ?: 132  [call-with-values #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f #>]
   ?: 133  (@call-with-values (producer consumer))
   ?: 134* [#<procedure #f ()>]
   ?: 135* [syntmp-gen-syntax-1074 #(syntax-object # #) #(syntax-object begin 
#) ...]
   ?: 136  (if (syntmp-id?-115 syntmp-e-1110) (let* (#) (let* # #)) ...)
     ...
   ?: 137  (if # # #)
   ?: 138* [syntmp-ellipsis?-160 #(syntax-object begin (# # # #))]
   ?: 139  (and # #)
     ...
   ?: 140  [syntmp-free-id=?-138 #(syntax-object begin #) #(syntax-object ... 
#)]
   ?: 141  (and (eq? # #) (eq? # #))
   ?: 142* [eq? ...
   ?: 143*  (let* ((syntmp-x-885 syntmp-i-883)) (let* (#) (if # # 
syntmp-e-886)))
   ?: 144   (let* (#) (if # # syntmp-e-886))
   ?: 145*  (if # # syntmp-x-885)
   ?: 146*  [syntmp-syntax-object?-101 #(syntax-object begin (# # # #))]
   ?: 147   (and (vector? syntmp-x-1008) (= (vector-length syntmp-x-1008) 3) 
...)
   ?: 148*  [= ...
   ?: 149*   (vector-length syntmp-x-1008)

<unnamed port>: In expression (vector-length syntmp-x-1008):
<unnamed port>: Stack overflow