[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:20:43 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

Hi Han-Wen,

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

> Applied, with corrections.

I noticed the (supposedly related) regression compared to 1.8.  Consider
this program:

  (define p (open-output-file "TEST-FILE"))

  (setvbuf p _IOFBF 16384)

  (write "hello" p)

When running it with "guile-1.8 the-program.scm", `TEST-FILE' contains
the string "hello" upon completion.  However, with HEAD, `TEST-FILE' is

Can you try to see if it somehow relates to your patch?

(I suspect that ports used to be flushed when reclaimed, which is no
longer the case with the weak hash table.)

Thanks in advance,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]