[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:16:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Elf <address@hidden> writes:
> (i usually start people off with guile nowadays,
> despite its non-r5 compliance, as the wizard book is still around r4
> material.)
I hope you don't mind me emailing you in response to your r6rs post;
I'm one of the Guile developers.
I wondered if you could say more about the r5-non-compliance that you
perceive? I thought we had solved all r5 compliance issues by now.
(Last time I heard it claimed that Guile was not r5-compliant, I
followed it up, and it was to do with a couple of tests relying on the
order of evaluation of letrec initializers. But that is fixed now.)
Many thanks,
Neil
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS,
Neil Jerram <=
- Message not available
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/28
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/29
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/29
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Julian Graham, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Julian Graham, 2007/10/31
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/31
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/31