[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pkgsrc patches: patch-ag

From: Greg Troxel
Subject: Re: Pkgsrc patches: patch-ag
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:29:40 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
>> Fix for solaris, but I thinh preserves behavior on C99 machines.
>> $NetBSD: patch-ag,v 1.5 2007/07/20 00:09:22 gdt Exp $
>> solaris-2.9 does not have stdint.h but does have inttypes.h
>> --- libguile/c-tokenize.c.orig       2007-06-13 18:00:56.000000000 -0400
>> +++ libguile/c-tokenize.c
>> @@ -39,7 +39,12 @@
>>  #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 1
>>  #endif
>> +#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
>> +#include <stdint.h> /* May break IA64 test-noansi-r */
>> +#else
>>  #include <inttypes.h>
>> +#endif
> First, the comment and the patch are contradictory.  A bit of googling
> seems to confirm the comment, in which case the patch isn't needed.
> Second, C99 requires both (Sections 7.18 and 7.8).
> Third, the `#include' is within a `#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L', so
> only C99 systems get to include it.
> Fourth, this is a Flex-generated file, so it'd be nice to avoid patching
> it.
> Just to say that I'm dubious about this patch.  :-)

I think the issue is that some versions of solaris do not have stdint.h,
but do have inttypes.h.  But, the patch may be wrong in dealing with it.

Does guile have a position on supporting systems that don't conform to
C99?  I'm wondering if I should try to figure this out and get a fix
that is reasonable (I agree this one is gross and likely wrong), or just

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]