[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: srfi-18 requirements

From: Julian Graham
Subject: Re: srfi-18 requirements
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 22:07:49 -0400

Hi Neil,

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> wrote:
> OK, that's in now.  I had a few minor comments, please see the attached.

Hey, that's great!  I know there are some unresolved issues -- I'll
address them as soon as I can.  Thanks, again, to you and Ludovic for
being patient and helpful in shaping that original morass of code over
these many (almost 8?  Yikes) months.

As promised, I've written a NEWS entry; find attached a git patch for
that.  And I've taken a look at the comments you made and integrated
them into a separate patch, also attached.  I tried to write something
resembling a ChangeLog entry in my commit message, as per what you and
Andy Wingo were discussing earlier.  Let me know if it's not

Sorry about the module import/export redundancies -- I was kind of
fuzzy on the semantics around export vs. re-export vs. replace.
Likewise object-property, of which I was unaware when I originally
wrote that code last year.

The only thing I didn't change was the `thread-terminate!' behavior.
If I understand your comment, then, no, the exit of a non-canceled
SRFI-18 thread doesn't require the installation of that exception
handler.  (That handler's purpose is to notify future joiners of the
cancellation event, which is unnecessary if the thread is never


Attachment: 0001-Update-NEWS-file-for-SRFI-18-and-associated-core-thr.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0001-srfi-18.scm-Remove-redundant-module-imports-and-s.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]