Re: Plan for 2.0

[David Séverin]

Le Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:25:47 +0000,
"Neil Jerram" <address@hidden> a écrit :

> 2009/1/4 David Séverin <address@hidden>:
> > Hi Guilers,
> >
> > It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd 
> > love to
> > see a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate 
> > scheme
> > procedures from others, scheme variables from others...:
> >
> >    * Concept Index
> >    * Scheme Prodedure Index    * C Procedure Index
> >    * Scheme Variable Index             * C Variable Index
> >    * Scheme Type Index                 * C Type Index
> >    * R5RS Index
> >
> > Being a scheme 'only' programmer, I'd love not to have to scroll through
> > gh_* and scm_* ... when I am looking for something in an index.
> 
> Thanks for this idea!
> 
> I'm not persuaded by the procedure/variable/type separation, but I
> agree that the Scheme/C separation would be useful.  Do you know
> Texinfo well enough to look at how we could achieve this?

Never used Texinfo :( I could learn, but right now I can not offer more than 
using
guile and giving the best feedback I can on matters I feel knowledgeable enough 
to
do so [I am alone managing a small company [+- a year late in my work]].

Cheers,
David