[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:34:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was under the impression that Windows users would often prefer
> software that requires “only” MinGW, as opposed to the more heavyweight
> Cygwin. From that point of view a MinGW port seems to be useful,
> especially if Guile does part of the OS abstraction job that Cygwin
> does.
Yes, agreed now. It was wrong of me to suggest that MinGW support might
not be necessary...
> I agree that portability tricks should primarily be directed to Gnulib.
Thanks,
Neil
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, Peter Brett, 2010/03/22
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/22
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/03/28
- Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work,
Neil Jerram <=
Re:Reconsideration of MinGW work, carlo\.bramix, 2010/03/21
Re:Reconsideration of MinGW work, carlo\.bramix, 2010/03/22