[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Some tweaks to the R6RS support
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Some tweaks to the R6RS support |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:38:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Andreas,
On Wed 27 Oct 2010 00:53, Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
> * module/rnrs/base.scm (error, assert): Define -- they were missing.
> (assertion-violation): Properly treat a #f `who' argument.
>
> * module/rnrs/conditions.scm (condition): Use `assertion-violation'
> instead of the undefined `raise'.
> (define-condition-type): Fix for multiple fields.
> * test-suite/tests/r6rs-conditions.test: Test accessors of a
> multiple-field condition. Also import `(rnrs base)' to allow
> stand-alone running of the tests; apparently the `@' references
> scattered throughout the R6RS modules make the libraries sensitive to
> their load order -- for instance, trying to load `(rnrs conditions)'
> before `(rnrs base)' is loaded fails.
>
> * module/rnrs/records/inspection.scm: Use `assertion-violation' instead
> of an explicit `raise'.
> * module/rnrs/records/syntactic.scm (process-fields): Use
> `syntax-violation' instead of bogus invocations of `error'.
This patch no longer applies. Apologies for the delay. Can you take a
look at which parts are still valid?
Thanks,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: [PATCH] Some tweaks to the R6RS support,
Andy Wingo <=