[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECMAScript support broken?
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: ECMAScript support broken? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:39:26 -0500 |
Yes, I agree.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Kan-Ru Chen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here's a new version. I think the commit message is better - please
>> let me know if this is not right. There's also a test for it.
>
>> + `(apply (@ (language ecmascript impl) new-object)
>
> I think if you use ,(@implv new-object) here it would be more consistent
> with the ,(@implv new-array) case just above this code snippet :)
>
> Kanru
> --
> A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
> book is a crime.
> -- Gilbert Highet
>
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), (continued)
- Re: Sputnik test result, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/27
- Re: Sputnik test result, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/27
- Re: Sputnik test result, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/27
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/04
Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/03