Re: 2.0.x branched!

[Neil Jerram]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri 18 Feb 2011 21:37, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Now that 2.0.0 is out, I presume the general procedure from now on
>> should be:
>>
>> - committing safe 2.0.x stuff (in particular, as far as I'm concerned,
>>   docs) to the stable-2.0 branch
>>
>> - committing anything else to master
>>
>> - periodically merging from stable-2.0 to master.
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> That sounds about right to me, though I am quite ignorant in this
> regard.  Compatible changes on 2.0.x seem fine to me; we should live in
> 2.0.x for a year or two I think.
>
> Tough to plan for the future, though!

Cool, thanks!

    Neil