Re: thoughts on peval

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Wed 21 Sep 2011 11:31, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

[...]

>> I was well aware of the risk of excessive inlining, but I thought that
>> this and the two other conditions to abort inlining would mitigate the
>> problem (the two other conditions being: any static args, and no
>> recursive calls in the residual code.)
>
> Well, add a (($ <module-ref>) app) clause to that (match proc ...)
> block, and trace what it's doing.  It's pretty crazy :)

OK, will do!

Thanks,
Ludo’.