Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?

[David Kastrup]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> We could add a compiler option to turn string literals into
> (string-copy FOO).  Perhaps that's the thing to do.

What for?  It would mean that a literal would not be eq? to itself, a
nightmare for memoization purposes.

And for what?  For making code with explicitly undefined behavior
exhibit a particular behavior that is undesirable in general.

-- 
David Kastrup