[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: add-relative-load-path ?

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: add-relative-load-path ?
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:41:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)


Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Wed 25 Jan 2012 13:42, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>> What about calling it ‘current-file-name’ instead?
>>>   > (apropos "filename")
>>>   (guile): set-module-filename!     #<procedure 1546f20 at 
>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1712:2 (module val)>
>>>   (guile): module-filename  #<procedure 1546fa0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1712:2 
>>> (module)>
>>>   (guile): current-filename
>>>   (guile): set-port-filename!       #<procedure set-port-filename! (_ _)>
>>>   (guile): port-filename    #<procedure port-filename (_)>
>>>   (ice-9 readline): filename-completion-function    #<procedure 
>>> filename-completion-function (_ _)>
>>>   > (apropos "file-name")
>>>   > 
>>> Though I am responsible for three of those, I think I was just following
>>> established convention.
>> Hmm, OK then.
> We can still change it if it's the right thing, but we would probably
> need to do the same with the other interfaces (with the deprecation
> dance).

Right.  Or we could keep both, for those that already existed?  (Just
like some software packages have both “color” and “colour” in their

> Note that there's also the instance of 'filename in alists, like in
> source properties.  We probably wouldn't be able to change those.

Yes, this one cannot be changed.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]