[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plugged a memleak
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: plugged a memleak |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:03:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed 21 Mar 2012 22:02, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> See c05805a4ea764dec5a0559edefcdfb9761191d07 in stable-2.0 for the
>> gnarly details. The summary is that applicable smobs were being leaked,
>> because they were referenced in the values of weak-key tables.
>
> I was wondering whether removing ‘smob-call’ would break binary
> compatibility, but presumably that instruction could not possibly end up
> in user bytecode on disk, right?
Presumably not. It is documented, though. We can remove it, but its
continued presence doesn't cost us anything. I'm OK with either option
:)
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/